(see also main text section 4.8 and section 6.17)
- location including grid reference,
abbreviated if necessary to protect the site from
unauthorised interference
- map/location plan
- the period and type of site
- the condition of the site, and the
anticipated state of preservation of its deposits
- a short synopsis of previous
archaeological work
- the location of existing site
archives, and the extent to which they have been
consulted
- the results of any evaluation
fieldwork undertaken
- the threat or other justification for
carrying out the proposed work
- the legal status of the site
- the timing of the project
- arrangements for access agreed with
landowners and site occupiers
- proposed reinstatement (after
excavation)
- where is it intended that the
excavated material and records should be deposited and
curated. This must be discussed and agreed with
landowners, museum authorities and other relevant bodies
- any specific recording requirements
resulting from the decision on final location of the
material
- any specific environmental or other
conditions anticipated to be necessary for the optimum
storage of site data
The following should be described and
justified:
- the contribution the project is
expected to make to archaeological knowledge, in the
context of the current framework of local, regional, and
national research priorities. For all projects (not just
those funded by English Heritage) reference may usefully
be made to English Heritage funding criteria (1991). In
summary the following attributes of a site should be
considered:
- survival/condition
- period
- rarity
- fragility/vulnerability
- documentation
- group value
- potential
- the potential for integrating a
project with existing archaeological research for example
funded by the Science and Engineering Research Council
(SERC) or a university
- opportunities for integrating aspects
of a project with related non-archaeological research,
for example, if the site is within a Site of Special
Scientific Interest (SSSI)
- likely possibilities for future
research which may emerge from the project
- opportunities for experimental work
- the likely scale of the published
report (eg monograph, article or note) and the intended
place of publication. The relevant editor or editorial
committee must be consulted
- arrangement made for display and
public information including possibilities for community
involvement or liaison with museums, schools etc
Particular attention should be paid to the
relationship between the data which it is anticipated will be
gathered, the methodological approach to be applied to these data
and the project's objectives (as expressed in section A2.2). The
statement should make clear how the methods advocated are those
best suited to ensuring that the data collected will fulfil the
stated aims of a project. The following should be considered in
the formulation of a methods statement:
- the components of a site which will be
investigated and those which will not
- the different types of data-gathering
methods to be used, for example documentary research,
survey, photogrammetry, excavation, environmental
sampling
- the recovery and recording strategies
which it is intended to employ during fieldwork, for
example sampling of selected deposits, on-site flotation
and sieving, finds recovery and processing programmes and
discard policies. These should be related to the
different classes of data anticipated from the site, for
example structural data artefacts, environmental material
- in those cases where a suitable
methodology does not appear to exist, consideration
should be given to the necessity for developmental work
- details should be given of the
structure and size of the project teams and the levels of
expertise represented by its component members. The need
for any collective or individual pre-fieldwork training
should be identified
- all the tasks identified in the
methods statement should be listed and related to the
individual members of the project team
- information should be given of the
materials and equipment needed to fulfil the tasks
defined in the methods statement (eg the hire of heavy
plant, flotation equipment)
- details, compiled in association with
a conservator and relevant museum professional, of
materials and equipment needed to ensure that the
archaeological data collected (eg records, artefacts,
environmental material) are appropriately stored and
curated
- details of premises hire, security
provision, health and safety provision
- details should be supplied of the
projected programme of the project through to completion.
This should include fieldwork, assessment, analysis, and
dissemination
- the programme should be expressed on a
cascade chart or by some similar form of graphic
representation. The cascade chart should show:
all the tasks to be
undertaken in the correct sequence the inter-relatedness and
interdependence of tasks
time-critical
elements
the length of time
allocated to each task
the personnel (or
grade) allocated to each task
agreed monitoring
points
- the costs of undertaking the work
programme described should be presented making clear the
basis of the calculation, for example salary scales,
allowance for inflation and any other adjustments
- once the tasks directly related to
fulfilling the projects objectives have been costed,
allowance should be made for other legitimate costs, for
example general administrative and managerial tasks,
participation in project team meetings, employers
liability insurance, compliance with health and safety
legislation, monitoring, staff holidays, training etc
- cashflow and detailed cost projections
should be shown in conjunction with the timetable shown
on the cascade chart
© English Heritage 1991
Web Design: ©
Digital Archaeological
Reports
Last updated: Thu Oct 8 1998